Mt. Vernon Independent Democrats "Our Mission"

“If that body of elected officials are ignorant, reckless and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness and corruption. As members of Mt. Vernon Independent Democrats we will demand any fraud of the people be stopped.”

The Mt. Vernon Independent Democrats (MVID) will use innovative grassroots organizing strategies to help candidates break through the political glass ceiling. The MVID will target and mobilize support for all the races (including any important ballot measures) in one coordinated campaign. We also recruit and endorse strong community activist early in their political careers, recognizing that a candidate may have to run more than once to win.

The Mount Vernon Independent Democrats will be the voice for residents of Mt. Vernon in the politics of the Democratic Party. Born from the idea of the need of reform of the usual party boss rule for political gain without gain for the people in Mt. Vernon that includes all ethic groups and economic backgrounds.

As Independent Democrats we will continue to support progressive government and issues, help elect honest and intelligent public officials, and supports deserving and qualified judicial candidates. We serve as a direct conduit to local elected officials, organize forums to introduce prospective candidates to the voters, and then organize support behind our endorsed candidates.

With the MVID dedicated membership, and its network with other grassroots and community organizations, the MVID offers distinct benefits to both the candidates and the causes we support, as well as to the people who contribute to them. This is an organization "For the People and by the People."

Thursday, February 28, 2013

A County of Great Contrasts Where Does Mount Vernon Fit









Located just north of New York City and replete with scenic beauty, the county of Westchester has been an attractive residential location for decades.  Desirable real estate and a history of prosperous growth have given the county a reputation of affluence, but in reality, Westchester is a place of extreme haves and have-nots.  With one of the largest income gaps in the nation, Westchester is indeed “a county of great contrasts.”

Westchester County is, in many ways, a microcosm of New York State economics where wealth is deeply concentrated and poverty is higher than both the national average and of any other Northern state.  Income inequality in New York State is not only the highest in the nation but higher than Mexico and Sri Lanka. The gap between the rich and poor continues to widen dramatically as does the gap between the rich and middle class. The top fifth of New York State households earn 8.1 times the bottom fifth  and 2.8 times that of the average middle income earner. Income inequality in Westchester is even more pronounced: the top fifth earns 20 times what the bottom fifth earns.  This is one of the widest income gaps in the nation.  The wealthiest 5 percent earned an average $666,222 in 2006, which ranks third in the nation, following only Fairfield, Connecticut and Manhattan.  Such wealth overshadows a much larger portion of the county’s population struggling to get by.

Westchester’s high countywide averages have promoted a false perception of ubiquitous affluence for decades, and as a consequence, economic insecurity is underreported and often dismissed.  Poverty remains invisible to some of the county’s very own residents, many of whom commute to Manhattan for work each day and return to their isolated communities.  As Nada Khader of WESPAC points out, Westchester is “unique because there are communities where you can live all of your life and never be exposed to the poverty.”The truth is that there are not pockets of poverty in Westchester but rather, pockets of immense wealth that inflate county statistics and diminish the economic challenge faced by many.  “We’ve labored on the concept that Westchester is affluent and therefore everyone is affluent, but the reality is that poverty is everywhere,” says Dennis Hanratty, director of Mount Vernon United Tenants.

The Cost of Living in Westchester
According to 2005 U.S. Census data, Westchester County has a poverty rate of 8.8% or 83,000 people living at or below the poverty line.  Because the poverty line is set by the federal government, however, it does not take into account the high cost of living in Westchester and thus masks the true number of county residents facing economic and food insecurity.  While the federal poverty line for a family of four is set at $20,000, it is estimated that a family of four in Westchester would have to earn $55,000 just to meet the most basic needs of shelter, food and clothing.  The poverty rate in Westchester would triple under this estimate.

Hard work is not enough to overcome poverty and eradicate economic insecurity.  Wages that may be sufficient to get by in other areas of the country are not enough to live in Westchester, largely because of the county’s extremely high housing prices.  According to the 2008 Cost of Living Index, the cost of living in Westchester is considered “very high” at 56 points higher than the national average of 100. Wages have not increased with the cost of living making it difficult for many to keep up.

For those who qualify for temporary assistance, welfare can help to obtain basic necessities such as heat, housing, food, and clothing.  The welfare grant, however, does not lift people out of poverty or even lift them above 50 percent of the federal poverty level.  The welfare grant increased this year for the first time since 1990 but the 10 percent increase is not even one-fifth the rate of inflation during this period.[11] The basic cash grant for a family of three now provides $320 per month while the shelter allowance has not been increased and remains at $426.  We praise Governor Paterson and state lawmakers for finally raising the state welfare grant after 18 years. The Governor should be commended for proposing an increase even as the state faced a massive budget deficit. However, even a 30% raise over 3 years falls far short of restoring the lost purchasing power over the last two decades, let alone raising the grant to an adequate level.

Westchester’s workfare program, Pride In Work, became a national model by the mid-1990’s because it significantly decreased welfare rolls.  The workfare program forced people to work 20 hours per week for their welfare checks under the guise that it would prepare them for employment.  The jobs people are given under this program, however, amount to little more than picking up garbage and cut into the time that people have to look for a job. Many people who do find work and leave the welfare rolls are still not any better off despite the claim that having a job equals a better life.  For a person working a 40-hour week on minimum wage, their annual income would be just over $15,000.  This is not enough to cover taxes, rent, utilities and public transportation, let alone food.

Jobs

Finding a job that pays well is an extremely difficult challenge.  Nada Khader of WESPAC stresses both the loss of local jobs and lack of job creation as major barriers to economic security.[14] Blue-collar workers have a difficult time competing in the county because it lacks major employment sectors such as manufacturing and agriculture.  More than half of all jobs are concentrated in three sectors: trade, transportation and utilities (19.3 percent), education and health services (18.1 percent), and government (15.4 percent).

Twenty-five years ago, Westchester was a desirable place for large corporations to relocate to but many downsized or left in the 1990’s.  The downsizing and relocation was most prevalent in the manufacturing sector.  A General Motors plant in Tarrytown closed in 1995 because of the high cost of energy and this resulted in the loss of over 2,000 jobs.  The high energy cost, as well as the lack of affordable housing, deterred business growth and led many corporations to leave the county, taking many jobs with them.  Small businesses are the dominant employers, with nearly 90 percent of all businesses in the county employing 20 people or less.  In contrast, only 20 businesses employ over one-thousand.

While there has been job growth in Westchester in recent years, it has mainly occurred in the financial and business sectors.  Twenty percent of all wages paid in 2006 were in the professional and business sectors.  The biggest wage increases occurred in the financial and business sectors, with the financial sector accounting for nearly half of all wage gains in the county.  Salaries in financial services rose 26.3 percent between 2003 and 2006 to an average annual salary of $95,150, compared to a county average of $58,630.

Housing

Exorbitant housing costs in Westchester are a major source of economic insecurity.  Chuck Bell of Consumers Union maintains that the high cost of housing is perhaps the largest barrier to economic security for Westchester families in addition to finding a job that pays well.[18] Debbie Perkins of Community Housing Innovations notes that “even working families end up poor and homeless due to the high cost of housing.”[19] Between 2000 and 2006, real property values in the county rose an astonishing 75 percent.  With the median value of a single-family home in Westchester at $630,000, the county has the second highest real estate values in the state (second only to Manhattan).[20] This is more than three times the national median price of $170,300 and almost three times more than the median price in the Northeast region ($228,200).

High property costs translate into a shortage of affordable housing units.  To own a house in Westchester requires an income such that home ownership is not an option for the poor and middle class.  Renters, who make up 59.5 percent of Mount Vernon and half of Yonkers residents, finding a quality rental within their means is challenging if not impossible. The average monthly rent for a two-bedroom apartment is $1,600, an annual cost of $19,200, and almost a 50 percent increase from just over a decade ago.  Incomes have not increased on pace with housing costs which severely limits housing options for low-income residents.  These costs pose a challenge even for those in the middle income bracket.  For those who are limited to monthly rents of $1,200 per month or less, the choices are very few and far between.  Many have no choice but to live in overcrowded, substandard conditions.  Landlords, in light of financial difficulties due to the recession, are also forcing many out of their homes.  Without adequate legal resources, many low-income residents end up homeless. There are over 3,000 homeless people in Westchester County, almost two-thirds resulting from eviction.

For residents relying on SSI, particularly veterans and those with disabilities, the situation is even more calamitous.  A recent study, Priced Out in 2008, found that Westchester is the fourth least affordable place for SSI recipients in the nation, following only Honolulu (HI), Columbia City (MD) and Nantucket (MA).  A modest one-bedroom apartment in Westchester costs almost double (197.3 percent) their monthly income.  SSI recipients often find themselves priced out of studios and efficiency apartments as well.  While the federal government stipulates that housing costs for low-income households should not exceed 30 percent of income, those on SSI are forced to spend upwards of 70% of their income on rent.  Many cannot find affordable housing within their means which leaves most in either substandard housing or on the street.[24] This report clearly shows, says Mel Tanzen of Westchester Disabled on the Move, “people with disabilities cannot even afford the bare essentials.  With the reduction in Section 8 funding over the last 8 years, it is next to impossible for those on SSI to find housing in Westchester County.”

The lack of regulation and intervention at the federal level has contributed to the decrease in affordable housing. Dennis Hanratty, director of Mount Vernon United Tenants, suggests that all levels of government need to work more cooperatively to combat this problem.  While the Section 8 program, both tenant based and project based, are great programs, they are no longer being adequately funded due to the focus on tax credits for home ownership.[25] The result has been a severe increase in subprime mortgages and foreclosures throughout the county.

Subprime mortgages nearly tripled in Westchester between 2004 and 2006. In the first half of 2007, foreclosure filings increased 32 percent while actual foreclosures increased 62 percent.  Subprime mortgages have disproportionately affected black and Latino residents, particularly in areas such as Yonkers, New Rochelle, Mount Vernon and Greenburgh, as predatory lenders have targeted low-income neighborhoods.  Predatory lenders target people with less-than-perfect credit, offering a low-interest rate that is adjustable and rises sharply after a year or two.  These lenders assure residents upon purchasing their homes that they will be able to refinance their loans when rates increase, never indicating that refinancing for subprime mortgages is often done at a rate that drives people further into debt.  Or, in many cases, the request for refinancing is simply denied and people are forced into foreclosure.

For many, including Ms. Quanda Moore of Mount Vernon, buying a home fulfills the so-called American Dream.  “It was just a good feeling to have something that you could call yours,” she says.  Ms. Moore, who was forced out of work due to falling ill, fell behind on payments and her request to refinance was denied as her mortgage was sold to another lender.  With the assistance of Westchester Residential Opportunities, Ms. Moore was able to renegotiate her mortgage and stay in her home.[27] Others are not as fortunate.  Foreclosures skyrocketed 200 percent between the first quarter of 2005 and the first quarter of 2008.  Many remain on the verge of foreclosure with highly fluctuating adjustable-rate mortgages that can double from one month to the next. One such resident describes daily life as “living with a gun to your head.”

Hunger

The choice between shelter costs or putting food on the table forces many to turn to emergency food providers and other entities to help bridge the gap.  This choice is not new for many residents of Westchester County.  A 1993 study found that one-third of Westchester residents had to choose, at least once, between paying the rent or buying food.  The demand for food increased 11-fold in the 1990s which put a strain on local emergency food providers.  An estimated one in four residents, including middle income earners, sometimes went hungry.  Even those receiving food stamps went hungry as food prices skyrocketed.[29] A decade later, hunger continues to be a major issue in Westchester.

While it is difficult to determine the exact number of the hungry because many are reluctant to acknowledge their reliance on services, the Food Bank for Westchester estimates that an approximate 200,000 people, or 21 percent of total residents, are hungry or at risk of hunger in Westchester.  The most vulnerable are women, seniors, children and the disabled.  In 2007, over 200 emergency food providers served approximately 5.5 million meals to Westchester residents, a near 20 percent increase from the prior year.  Half of these meals were served to children.[30] Food pantries, such as Ecumenical Emergency Food Pantry in White Plains, have seen a 30 percent increase in demand since January 2008. In the same time, Sacred Heart Food Pantry of Mount Vernon has seen their demand nearly double.  Last month, Sacred Heart signed up 19 new families, providing food for a total 231 households, including 177 children and 50 elderly.

In 2006, nearly 21,000 households, or 39,640 residents, relied on food stamps. The food stamp program is a federal program that is administered on the county level.  It helps to supplement food during tough times for families and individuals while boosting the local economy through the infusion of federal funds. Food stamps, however, are not adjusted for inflation which makes it increasingly difficult for recipients to afford what they need.  In 2007, the USDA reported a 4 percent increase in food prices, which not only outpaces inflation but is nearly double the 10-year average food price increase.[34] Many food stamp recipients rely on emergency food providers to help bridge the gap each month.

Without pantries and soup kitchens, many would not be able to make it.  Hard-working mothers rely on food banks to provide groceries for their children while seniors, often incurring high medical expenses and living on fixed incomes, utilize senior lunch programs.  Some parents even place their children in remedial summer classes that they do not need simply because a free meal is provided.[35] While hunger has a detrimental impact on all, it is especially threatening to children whose growth, development and learning ability depend on adequate nutrition.
Education 

Education has an enormous influence on one’s future economic security.  In Westchester County, those who do not graduate high school are three times more likely to be poor than those who do and ten times more likely to be poor than those who graduate college.  With the increased demand for a more educated workforce, it is more important than ever that all children have access to quality education.

Although Westchester spends more per pupil than any other county in New York, with the exception of Hamilton, resources vary significantly by school district.  Lower income areas have less resources which translates into higher student-teacher ratios, significantly less support staff and below average high school student outcomes.  In areas with higher median incomes, students are not only less likely to drop out or get suspended but are much more likely to graduate within four years and subsequently attend college. Chappaqua, for example, has a median income of $174,579 and a 99 percent four-year graduation rate, whereas Mount Vernon’s median income is $49,573 and just over half of students graduate in four years.  While Yonkers and Mount Vernon account for almost one quarter of all county school enrolment and share the same four-year graduation rate, which is the lowest at 55 percent, the wealthy areas of Briarcliff Manor, Bronxville, and Scarsdale share the highest at 99 percent.Yonkers and Mount Vernon also have the highest drop-out rates in the county, 4.6 percent and 3.9 percent respectively, as compared to a zero percent in the wealthy areas of Chappaqua, Bronxville and Scarsdale (the countywide average is 1.7 percent).

Underperforming schools and poverty go hand in hand.  Of the 40 school districts in Westchester, ten have a poverty rate between 5 and 10 percent while seven others have a poverty rate higher than 10 percent. In Yonkers, the largest city in Westchester and the fourth largest city in the state, 18.3 percent of public school children live in poverty.  In Mount Vernon, 19 percent of children live in poverty.[39] It is important to keep in mind that these numbers, staggering as they are, are set according to the federal poverty line.  The number of children in these schools who live in households that lack economic and food security is much higher.  In Yonkers, for example, the number of children eligible for the free lunch program in Yonkers (63 percent) is three times the number countywide (21 percent) and almost twice as many Yonkers children are eligible for reduced lunches (9 percent versus 5 percent countywide).[40] Unfortunately, the stigma associated with participating in these programs leads many eligible children to forego free meal programs.

The impact of hunger on children’s learning ability and overall health is devastating.  Poor nutrition and hunger adversely affect the cognitive performance of school-aged children.  Studies show that skipping breakfast decreases the speed and accuracy of problem-solving while low protein diets are correlated to low scores on achievement tests.  Children without adequate nutrition also have a greater difficulty fighting infections.  This causes them to get sick and miss class more frequently which often leads to falling behind in class.

Health Care

With the average annual health insurance premium for a family of four now costing $12,000, the burden of health care costs are no longer limited to those in poverty.  Health care costs, in fact, are a cause for poverty as people go into debt and bankruptcy due to high medical bills.  Westchester clinics, such as Open Door Family Medical Centers, have seen an increase in middle-income earners, including those making up to $70,000, who cannot afford the cost of health insurance or private health care.

For low-income earners, the state of health care often leaves them without any care at all.  Low-income earners are more likely to be affected by chronic and preventable diseases. Almost a quarter of hospitalizations in Westchester for children ages 1-12 are the result of asthma.

An estimated 11 percent of nonelderly Westchester residents are uninsured.  The cost of uncompensated care provided to the uninsured in Westchester is approximately $107 million; statewide, the cost is $2.8 billion. The health care crisis extends far beyond Westchester and New York State.  The United States faces a health care crisis of epic proportions that affects all levels of government—local, county, state and federal—and residents of all regions and socioeconomic levels.  The US is unique in that it spends more than any other nation on health care yet it remains the only industrialized country in the world that does not provide health care for all of its citizens.

The reason the US spends more and gets less than the rest of the world is because we have a patchwork system of for-profit payers. Private insurers necessarily waste health dollars on things that have nothing to do with care: overhead, underwriting, billing, sales and marketing departments as well as huge profits and exorbitant executive pay. Doctors and hospitals must maintain costly administrative staffs to deal with the bureaucracy. Combined, this needless administration consumes one-third (31 percent) of Americans’ health dollars.

As a result of the inadequate health care system in the U.S. nearly 50 percent of bankruptcies occur because of health care bills.  Three out of four of those bankrupted by health care bills have health insurance.

We believe that health care is a human right, and everyone should have full access from “the womb to the tomb”, regardless of income, employment, age, residency, or household status.  We support a Single-Payer, universal health care system in which the government handles all billing and payment for health care services.

Child Care

The early years of a child’s life are vital to their development.  While many children who are too young to attend school are cared for by their parents, grandparents, or hired in-home care, many others receive care outside of the home.  The cost of child care adds an additional burden on those who are already struggling to make ends meet.

The average weekly cost of full-time child care in Westchester is $240 for pre-school children, $279 for toddlers (18 months to 3 years) and $307 for infants (6-18 months).  This equates to a staggering average monthly cost of $960 for pre-school children, $1,116 for toddlers and $1,228 for infants.  In 2006, state regulated child care providers in Westchester cared for one in five children under the age of three and more than 20 percent of pre-school children.[46]

Urban Communities

Countywide statistics show a striking contrast between wealth and poverty but are often misleading because resources are not distributed evenly.  Community comparisons illustrate the daunting challenges faced by residents, particularly those in urban areas where median incomes are much lower than the county.  Urban areas have larger minority populations and children of minority races or ethnicities are twice as likely to live in poverty.

Conclusion

The reputation of affluence and the reality of poverty have contemporaneously persisted for decades in Westchester, with the former having much more resonance than the latter.  Indeed, the biggest challenge in addressing poverty in Westchester is getting past the perception that all of Westchester resembles Scarsdale or Chappaqua and everyone is doing well.  Economic insecurity in Westchester is a reality for many residents, and due to the high cost of living, it is a struggle to get by even for those with moderate incomes.

Economic insecurity pervades every area of life because all of the issues are inextricably linked.  It is time to sufficiently address poverty in Westchester.  Contact us and get involved in our effort to improve economic security for all.

Mount Vernon City Council Meeting "Wake Up &Speak Up"


Hassell-Thompson may vie for Davis' seat in Mount Vernon


ADS BY PULSE 360 
Frenzy Over New Diet Pill
Celebrity Doctor Reveals #1 "Miracle" Diet To Burn Fat Fast
Read more...
Top 10 Golf Swing Killers
Four Time Golf Teacher of the Year Corrects Your #1 Swing Flaw (Free).
www.RevolutionGolf.com
EZ Breathe Ventilation improves health!
Dehumidifies, ventilates, removes toxins, for only $4/month
Learn more...

MOUNT VERNON — State Sen. Ruth Hassell-Thompson is weighing a run for the seat now held by embattled Mayor Ernest Davis.
Hassell-Thompson, 70, a Democrat and former Mount Vernon councilwoman, formed what she called an exploratory political committee Monday to make a run at the mayoralty of her home city, a move she said was not influenced by Davis’ current woes.
“It’s not a decision. It’s a contemplation,” said Hassell-Thompson, who has held the Albany seat since 2000. “I’m looking to see, number one, if I can raise the money and, number two, if there’s an interest.”
“I’m contemplating it because people have approached me and asked me to consider it,” she added.
The move comes as Davis is in the midst of a federal probe surrounding businesses and charities he formed, and real estate he owns in four states. At leasttwo city employees have been subpoenaed.
Davis did not return calls seeking comment.
But Hassell-Thompson, who has $59,000 in her state Senate campaign committee, said Davis’ situation “is not influencing anything,” and said she is scheduled to meet with Davis and party leaders this week.
It’s also not the first time she considered the run. She said she was approached prior to the 2011 campaign, when Clinton Young was in office after defeating Davis in 2007.
Hassell-Thompson said she opted against the move, and Davis ultimately ran again successfully.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The Correlation between Crime, Violence and Poverty in Westchester County


The recent wave of violence in the cities ofWestchester should reminded us that every elected official, community leaders, concerned citizens, and residents should be held accountable for public safety, and the perception thereof, in our community. How true is that old African proverb, “It takes a village to raise a child?” From the looks of things, perhaps it has fallen to the wayside. For any city to have a nickname of “Murderville” should be of great concern of not only the residents but should be a focus of change among city elected officials.

There have been many debates on the effect of poverty has on high crime areas and communities. Studies show that there are more Americans in poverty in 2012 than there was in 1965.Westchester County, a county considered one of the wealthiest counties in America has no immunity to poverty and crime. 

Crime rates have a capacity to take a cities economy into a vicious cycle that causes unemployment and low community growth. In many of Westchester cities that are affected by crime and poverty you have a high population of minorities or poor whites.

Society on a whole has a general misconception of the link between poverty and crime. Although crime is often committed by those who are impoverished, all those who are poor do not commit crimes. Other misconceptions include the assumption that people of color are automatically more likely to commit crime because of the color of their skin rather than their surroundings and upbringing. Many of these misconceptions may lead to adverse effects of racism and bigotry in real-life meetings between those with and those without. Understanding and solving the root of the link between poverty and crime will inevitably cause citizens to take pride in their neighborhoods and become productive participants in the labor force.If we look at crime in the U.S. more broadly, patterns emerge that make it difficult to look at crimes as simply the personal faults of individual crooks and villains. Starting from the 70s, studies in the US pointed more and more at the link between unemployment, poverty and crime. Other connections like low income level, schooling, neighborhood quality, education, etc, were revealed as well. Dierdre Golash in her report The Case Against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law says that there is a “wide, (though not universal) agreement among criminologists that social factors such as income inequality, poverty, unemployment, and local social disorganization contribute to crime. One thread that all these potential causes listed by Golash have in common is the economic factor.
Is there disproportionality in wealth and economic development here in Westchester? Profoundly Yes!Cities like Mt. Vernon, whose medium family income is $50,555 compared to its neighbor Scarsdale whose medium income is $208,750. Rye City’s median income is $207,773 and neighboring Portchester is $51,652. Scarsdale minority population is 5.3% minority compared to Mt. Vernon’s 75.6% minority population and Rye city 7.8 % minority compared to Portchester’s 64.7%. The income inequality can be applied with other cities in Westchester.
There has even been discussion among Mt. Vernon home owners to file a joint lawsuit against the Westchester County government for Reparations. It is well known throughout political circles that in the 80’ and 90’s, Westchester County purposely move people living on Welfare, Receiving Section 8 Vouchers, and homeless shelters to cities like Mt. Vernon, Yonkers, Peekskill and other high minority populated areas and did not give financial assistance to fund support programs for the large migration of needy families that were purposely sent to these cities by the Westchester County government. At the beginning of this process, it was reported that former Mt. Vernon Mayor Blackwood was quoted saying “Mt. Vernon will not be a dumping ground for the poor”. Ironically, Mayor Blackwood was attacked by his own Democratic Party for standing up for the economic stability of Mt. Vernon. Now many years later, what you see in Mt. Vernon is the effect like many other cities in Westchester; high crime, high unemployment, low economic development and high taxes for homeowners

It’s reported that Westchester County Executive Rob Astrorino and his Administration terminatedcontracts that has threaten summer initiative for youth and moved $5.8 million from the 2011 budget for the Department of Social Services to paycorrection officers at the same time he wants to raise the parent share of subsidized child care under Department of Social Services. 
"Since the termination of contract and the programs, there are five youth participants currently housed at the Westchester County Department of Corrections. It cost tax payers thousands to house one youthful offender per year. I don't understand the logic of the Astorino's Administration” says Sonja Brown, Director of the Westchester RISE Program.
Crime is clearly an important problem that must be confronted. However, it cost about $40,000 to detain a person in a correctional facility in New York each year. Westchester County Jail moves over 10 thousand detainees through its doors per year. We see from an economic standpoint, detaining every prisoner is actually a greater burden to the tax payer than creating policies that truly address the needs of youth and families here in Westchester.
“From a Law Enforcement perspective, in hard economic times, police management and government has fallen away from community policing or thinking outside the box in addressing and solving the problems in our community before they become serious police problems. That’s how you being proactive in policing and in government”, says Ron Hampton, Executive Director of Blacks in Law Enforcement of America, Washington D.C.
Simply put, poverty and crime is created and sustained by putting Politics before its PeopleFirst, the budgets for antipoverty programs have never been substantial. Aid to Families with Dependent Children has declined since 1973. Second, Antipoverty programs often discourage desirable behavior like working, saving, and taking initiative, all of which contribute to income growth and an expansion of opportunity. At the same time, past experience tells us that the magnitude of the poverty and crime problem will not be reduced significantly in Westchester unless budgetary resources are increased to match the rhetoric of our elected officials.
 
I would say that in this county it would be hard to argue that there is not a relationship between crime and poverty. Poor people make up the overwhelming majority of those behind bars as 53% of those in prison earned less than $10,000 per year before incarceration. Given the outright correlation between poverty and crime, any policy serious about reducing crime has to take poverty reduction policies into account. We must focus on improved economic policies and a county-wide commitment to solving the problem, eradicating poverty--and therefore eradicating the crime that goes with it. Fighting crime goes far beyond policing and detaining, it is a true social justice plan on all levels of government.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Changing the Paradigm in the Electoral Process in Mt. Vernon


The election of President Obama demonstrated the power of constituent organizing, the dissatisfaction of many voters with the work of elected officials, and the importance of participating in the electoral process.

We can mourn the state of affairs, or we can use the elections as a wake-up call. We must make housing; jobs, economic development and racial inequity a political issue, and we can begin by holding our elected officials accountable. This is no easy task. It requires consistent vigilance and hard work. And yet, if we want a more just society in which everyone is adequately housed, fair wages, we must hold them accountable.

Fundamentally, elected officials care about one thing: votes. The keys to votes – and to the power needed to hold elected officials accountable – are people and money. Activists need to learn how to use these keys to influence elected officials. Use this four-step process to analyze your potential to hold your elected officials accountable and visibly demonstrate your organization's power.

1. Analyze Elected Officials

•Learn as much as possible about your elected officials. Learning about them one-by-one is crucial, because elections are held ward-by-ward or district-by-district.
•By how much did the elected official win the election? The smaller the victory, the better for you – he or she will be eager to hear from constituents.
•Who were the primary groups of people supporting the elected official? How many were "hard core" supporters and how many were possible swing voters?
•What are the elected official's positions on your issues? Are they firm ideologically, or are they more flexible depending upon the voters' positions?
•Where did the elected official's money come from? Is any of it from groups that oppose you? Is there evidence to suggest that the elected official is "bought" by moneyed interests?

2. Analyze Your Supporters and Potential Supporters.

•Who are the people who care most about your issues? Money and votes flow from the committed supporters.
•Who else might care about your issues? What other groups might be willing to vote based at least in part upon your issues?
•Are your supporters and potential supporters registered to vote, and did they vote in the last election?
•Did any of your supporters or potential supporters contribute money to their elected official?
•How can we "cut" our issues so they appeal to a broad segment of voters? In order to be successful in the long run, we need a majority in the district or ward supporting our positions. This means we have to define our issues more broadly  to unite poor and working class families. If not, they'll be pitted against one another, and we all lose.

3. Make a Plan.

•Is your elected official strong on your issues, and has he or she won the election by a wide margin? If so, keep up the good work. Maintain a relationship with the elected official and help that person strengthen the base in the community, but focus more attention on other, less agreeable or less popular elected officials.
•Is your elected official a supporter of your issues who won by a small margin? If so, you will need to shore up his or her support. Make sure your supporters are registered and come out to vote. Register other voters. Educate potential supporters about your positions and the importance of having your elected official's support.
•Is your elected official flexible (a moderate), depending upon the perceived interests of the district? You must demonstrate that a sizable portion of the district cares about your issues. The closer the election, the more the elected official cares about groups of voters; however, you must make sure that your group's support doesn't diminish the elected official's support from another group. If it does, you will have to demonstrate that votes and money support your position.
•Is your elected official indifferent or adverse to your issues while having won the election by a small margin?  Unless you think the elected official is redeemable, it is probably best to begin looking for another candidate to support and begin educating the voters about the official's position on your issues, so they will vote for an alternative candidate in the next election.
•Does your elected official oppose your issues but enjoy wide electoral support? This is the worst situation. Unless a very large number of unregistered voters could be registered and mobilized, you may want to consider focusing your efforts on other districts.

4. Demonstrate Your Power. It is not enough to have the people and campaign contributors on your side, you must visibly demonstrate that power. A few tried and true tactics for demonstrating your power include:

•Voter-registration drives. Make sure all new supporters are registered.
•Turn out the vote campaigns. Except in times of high publicity and high voter turnout, a well-orchestrated campaign to turn out the vote is an effective demonstration of power.
•Orchestrate communication with elected officials to help them gauge their constituents' concerns.
•Personal letters get the most weight, but they are hardest to generate. Postcards or petitions are less influential unless people send them in large quantities. It may be easier to collect 5000 postcards than 50 personal letters. Ideally, collect both.
•Use the phone and fax also. Seek quantity rather than quality. Politicians are seldom moved by the merits of the position, but they may well be moved by the breadth of constituent interest.
•Town hall meetings. Turn your supporters out to these meetings. Wear visible buttons or pins. Grab the mikes early and ask your questions. Be a visible force.
•Media coverage. Issues covered by the media are believed to concern constituents. Have supporters write letters to the editor (the second most widely read section of the paper), seek editorial board endorsements, write guest editorials. Try to get media coverage of every event possible demonstrating public support for your issues. Media coverage gives the impression of broad support and educates potential supporters.
•Accountability sessions. Ask the elected official to commit to your issue at a well-planned, large meeting between your supporters and the official. Invite the media and large segments of the community. These meetings are effective ways to demonstrate power and work especially well with flexible elected officials who won close election races.